Had my MRI today for the new left knee prosthesis. It was quite different from other MRIs I'd previously had. It was done according to strict proticols for the Zimmer "patient-specific implant." Like other MRI's it's noisier than a construction site inside a dance club on a Friday night; instead of earplugs, I got heavy-duty headphones plugged into the Siemens scanner, which has a hard drive filled with "relaxing classical music" (heavy on the Beethoven--that first movement of the 9th is hardly "relaxing") that the tech controls.
There were several separate short scans taken, each lasting less than a minute, for calibration purposes. The three main scans each lasted 5-6 min. I was carefully positioned on the table, with the left knee cradled in a special elevated "niche" cushion and then covered with a foam shield that was lashed into place with Velcro. Then my right leg was similarly tethered to the left with a Velcro strap. I was told to rest my arms across my chest and into the tube (part way) I went. I was told not to move, but that advice was sort of unneccessary (except, perhaps, the admonition not to wiggle my toes which themselves were unrestrained).
First scan was of the left ankle; second, the left hip; last, the main event--the knee itself. Why not just the knee? Apparently one of the parameters to be measured is the quadriceps-angle ("Q-angle") from the hip through the space within the knee joint through which the ligaments pass. One discovery made within the last 20 years is that women, regardless of frame size, have a wider Q-angle by about 3 degrees than men, which can lead to maltracking of the patella; which explains why the most common acute sports injury in women is a torn ACL (and it also occurs more in non-athlete women than in non-athlete men) and more women runners than men suffer chronic chondromalacia patellae. (Explains why after each of my non-TKR surgeries on either knee I had to get patellar taping at each PT session). The ankle is scanned for analysis of evidence of chronic overpronation (from flat feet), which can show up over time in the alignment of the ankle as well as in bone inflammation from the unusual stress of hypermobility--this, too, can cause patellar maltracking as well as misalignment between the tibial and femoral condyles of the knee joint. Over time, this wears down articular cartilage, et voilá: osteoarthritis, even in many women of normal weight.
The images were reviewed and immediately e-mailed to my OS, as well as to Zimmer. (I got sent home with a CD of them which my Mac can't read--gonna try it on my husband's PC laptop). Here's the really fascinating part--Zimmer copies the MRI images into a CAD-CAM program, which calculates the Q-angle, factors in gait influences from the ankle scan, and generates a 3-D mapped image that is fed to a 3-D printer. The printer produces a model of my actual knee joint, from which molds are made; titanium is poured into the molds and my actual prosthesis is cast. No needing to procure the correct size femoral and tibial components from off the shelf, and much less bone needs to be removed beyond the trashed articular cartilage. Less time on the table, with shorter risks from both anesthesia and infection, less blood loss to boot. And perhaps home sooner?
Here's the really amazing part: I do not have any pre-op X-rays scheduled. Not even a pre-op OS appointment: he has my bilateral films from last August's followup to compare with today's MRI images just in case there will be any leg-length discrepancies to address (and he can forward the x-rays to Siemens as well in case one of the molds needs to be made taller or shorter). Amazingly, in 2012 I had four sets of knee X-rays taken: two pre-op 3 months apart and two post-op. That's not an insignificant exposure to radiation, though at the time necessary. In 2013? None, except for my nuclear heart imaging in January (and had I not had those near-fainting episodes, I wouldn't have had that either).
Sorry this post was so long, but for those science geeks among us, this was so fascinating and totally different from my RTKR pre-op experience.