I read about Dr. Finn and using radiation; however, he then replaces the knee. I'm interested to know why you chose against radiation.
I discussed this with my surgeon and he expressed concern about the possibility of the x-rays interacting with the metal prosthetic parts (if they are left in, as I would have and it sounds like you might too) as well as increased risk of cancer, since the radiation must be powerful enough to change the tissues.
I also searched the medical literature at the time and the few studies I could find were small, not blinded, and had no controls - such poor experimental design means that the conclusions reached by these studies are essentially meaningless.
So, no proof of effectiveness and the possible risk of cancer made it a non-starter for me. Your mileage may vary.
The two studies I found were:
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8):1314-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.11.009. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
Low-dose irradiation and constrained revision for severe, idiopathic, arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty
Yasser R Farid <a title="University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois, USA." href="
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23523206/#full-view-affiliation-1">1</a>,
Rishi Thakral,
Henry A Finn
Affiliations Expand
************** and *******************
Cent. Eur. J. Med. • 7(4) • 2012 • 553-556DOI: 10.2478/s11536-012-0009-9
Central European Journal of Medicine
Irradiation in the treatment of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty: a preliminary trial
Clemens Baier*, Hans-Robert Springorum, Günther Maderbacher,Sebastian Winkler, Bernd Füchtmeier, Rainer Neugebauer
Department of Traumatology and Orthopeadic Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg,Teaching Hospital, University of Regensburg, Prüfeningerstraße 84, 93049 Regensburg, Germany