Sorry, but I'm having a little problem with this - how exactly do you define the difference between "disabled" and "crippled"? I'm curious/confused since my sister happens to be a quadriplegic who is also an attorney/Presidential Scholar/Phi Beta Kappa. As a kid she was frequently referred to as "crippled". These days she's "disabled" - political correctness, you know. Is there some other distinction I'm not aware of? Just wondering....
Fair question. As I grapple with it, bear in mind that as I came up with that admittedly vague mutter, I was driving out of a busy parking lot at the end of a long, tiring day, and talking to myself while struggling to put into words something that wasn't exactly clear to me.
But here's what I meant by that: because there are things I cannot do, I am disabled. We are all limited in what we can do (disabled) unassisted. Yesterday, I flew 400 miles; I had the help of an assistive device. Today, I cannot fly. That day in the grocery store, I chose to use the available assistive so that what energy I had left was available for the remaining chores of the day.
I felt that even though I was using the cart, I was just another shopper, shopping in a way that was appropriate for me. The treatment I got, primarily by the one customer, made me feel that I was seen as even more incapable than I was, and thus needed to accept help from others, for which the others earned some mystic Brownie points.
The bag boy asked me if I needed help out, and I declined, and he simply went on to ask another customer the same question. That felt appropriate and respectful. The other time I was shopping and had moved my groceries to a standard cart, and was on my crutch moving them into my car which was parked in a handicapped area, someone offered help. It was a man who walked up to me, made eye contact and said, "Excuse me. I notice that you are doing this one-handed. Would you like help?" And I smiled at him, thanked him, and said I was fine, and that was very kind of him to offer. Again, respectful and appropriate. I would have accepted that if I had needed it. I was given the choice in both cases.
This other woman took away my choice. She took away my choice to wait in line like everyone else. She took away my choice to unload my own groceries. And when she did those things, I felt more disabled than I was. I was disabled by her perception of me as one who could not take care of herself, as one who was out in public trying, but actually dependent upon the mercy of others.
I'm guessing that when your sister went to school, and when she goes to work, she made and makes use of assistive devices she feels to be appropriate. I'm also guessing that she manages her energy as a valuable and limited resource. That may mean she accepts help appropriately offered. Perhaps she gets annoyed when people talk to her as if she is also deaf and a little dull, or when people who don't know her call her "dear" because she's using an assistive device. I don't know her; you do. I'm speculating based on my own very limited experience. I wanted so be seen as a human being first, able to judge what help I needed. Maybe I looked a lot more pathetic than I realized. But I wasn't a hero or a sympathy case. I just needed some food.
There was another shopper there, a lot more subtle, but who also seemed to be getting some needs met in relationship with me. She looked like she'd just come from a workout, was wearing very tight yoga gear, great posture. But she carried this, "Look at me! I'm in great shape, and you are not," aura. My first encounter with her was a glance at the scooter (not the person using it), and uncoiling gracefully in front of me to get something. Not a big deal the first time, although after it happened four times in four different parts of the store, I understood a message was being conveyed. I watched her with others, and saw the same message given: "I am very fit and healthy, more so than you. You may look, but I am better than you and I will always be fit and healthy. You are inferior to me because you do not take care of yourself as do I." I pretty much failed to give Lululemon her stated due, and thought, "Okay, we get it, but when I was your age, I could have thrown you over my shoulders and done my shopping." I shook it off because she is young and has no idea that life has plans of its own. But I was already a little hypersensitive before I hit the checkout lines.
There's an article in the Ragged Edge (formerly the Disability Rag) about Tiger Woods saying that he had "hit like a spaz." The international press quoted him accurately, resulting in criticism and an apology overseas. The AP news wire tidied it up to "hit like a wreck", and there was no knowledge of the outcry or the apology disseminated in this country, or in what the Ragged Edge calls the "crip community". Why is "spaz" offensive to people who write about themselves as "crips"? Now there's putting a fine line on language use. I think it's a bit of that ethnonymic insider/outsider, we-can-say-this/you-can't thing.
In a blog article on "Reflections on the C-Word," Chava Willig Levy wrote:
Take the word “cripple.” The most appropriate use of the word “cripple” that I ever came across spanned the front page of my local newspaper: “BLIZZARD CRIPPLES THE CITY.”
“Finally!” I remember exulting. “Someone figured out what ‘cripple’ means!” And what is that, pray tell? Brought to a standstill. Stopped in its tracks. After all, according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, the Old English root of cripple is creep. I don’t know about you, but my disability – although severe – has not stopped me in my tracks.
You can read the rest of it here, if you wish. I found it worth the time:
broken link removed: https://chava.chavawilliglevy.com/?p=12 She closes with a story of how she more gracefully handled a similar situation. I was caught flat-footed and off-guard, tired, alone, and tolerated treatment that left me fuming and uncomfortable, although clearly well-meant.
I've been thinking about this subject a bit. I have a hang-tag in my car that qualifies me for handicap (from cap-in-hand, beggar) parking, and I see buttons I can push to open doors with my crutch tip that admonish me that they are for handicap use only. And I wonder why those places that are in front of us daily are exempt from the political correctness that has eliminated the use of those words in conversation or casual writing such as this.
Do we need something to designate people who require a little more leveling-of-the-playing-fields for situations like that? Maybe, or else we would have name-specific parking all over town, and that wouldn’t work either, nor would buttons that were labeled to be used only by Chandra Levy, your sister, and myself (but only through November). Unwieldy at best.
My grappling for words to integrate and understand that event wasn't necessarily successful. I often look back over what I’ve written and think, “Nope, that’s not it.” I continue to attempt to put experiences that are new to me, that are uncomfortable, disturbing, that leave me feeling helpless or amused or triumphant, into words, to share them here and to have them ideally sifted and given back to me, somehow understood in spite of their limitations, as they so often are.
There's a story told of a three year old who could not wrap his tongue around the -sh ending of a word, but when someone was talking to him and used the boy's pronunciation in his own speech, the child angrily retorted, "I said FIS, not FIS!" That's kind of what I was struggling to put into my own words there--that I don't have the words for my experience and feelings, but I still had my experience and feelings.
I think it’s completely valid for you to challenge what I wrote. The answer is, I don’t know what the answer is. I like Chandra Levy’s term best: “the quest for the ho-hum.” Until Ms Yogapants and the person who was climbing into heaven based on points accumulated by helping me made a point of my being otherwise, I was simply on my own quest for the ho-hum, as well as some nice red peppers.