Thanks for all the good wishes. Well, I'm back to square one! I, of course, did NOT see Professor Briggs, but one of his team! However, I'm guessing the outcome would have been the same. He did a further Xray and said that the knee replacement was a good one. He further said that both legs have a degree of valgus, but not an excessive amount (the operated one about 10% and the other about 9%). He acknowledged the pain I experience, but clearly felt that nothing more could be done. He is arranging further 'tests'; a bone scan - something about heat or hot in the site and then said something about isotopes. I've since looked this up and it appears that it may be a way of confirming degenerative osteoarthritis. I can't see the point of having that done frankly. The only way he felt that my pain might be helped 'a little' would be to resurface the patella. Again, I can't really see the point. For these further tests, I would have to go to Stanmore which is a long way from me. As it seems it's only going to confirm what each specialist has said so far, I feel a bit of a fraud and that I should just get on with it. He said that in about 80% of knee replacements recipients are satisfied with results. 20% of them the recipient is not happy with the result - I am evidently one of those. He did a thorough examination and at one point pressed on one side of the knee cap. I nearly jumped through the ceiling, the pain was intense, but although he noted that he didn't explain why that might be. I did ask questions (though not that one!) and did take notes. I really would rather he'd just said 'nothing more to be done' and left it at that. I can't be bothered to have these further tests. Fed up, but not that surprised. I want now to put it behind me and get on with my life - only now I'm disabled and before the RKR I wasn't. My left knee with its arthritis is staying put I can tell you!