Thanks for your interest in my story, Calicat and others. There are several reasons why I've never started another thread, but the main one, I suppose, is that I am just so aware that I am not at all sure of my facts, and wouldn't want to lead anyone down the wrong alleyway with the dubious benefit of my "advice".
Since that fateful New Year's Eve when I first fell out of the plane - I am such an exhibitionist - I feel as though I have just drifted through this experience, when ideally I would like to have been more at the helm, directing the movie, rather than taking a bit part. Kindly friends would say "How are things going with your hip now?" and I would find myself replying: "Er, I'm not quite sure. Can you ask me an easier one?"
I've always gone into my hospital appointments primed with incisive, pertinent questions. I take a notebook, and jot down key facts from replies. I phrase these questions to the best of my ability, and wait for the answers, sitting there all bright-eyed and bushy-tailed. Then something seems to go wrong...
I ask the question. The medical professional gives an answer. Surely we are making progress now? But no. The sensible well-phrased question meets the sensible well-phrased reply and somewhere in the middle entropy occurs. The communication link suffers some kind of catastrophic cut. This puzzles me. I have based my career as a writer on making myself understood. Why does this seismic shift occur whenever I am in a consulting room?
I wonder if anyone else has this problem?
Like you, I never quite recovered from my original op, having many aches and twinges, and a persistent limp. Unlike you, however, I really never had more than a couple of days of true pain. The word "infection" was only mentioned when I developed a soft lump, about the size of a tangerine, at the base of my incision, some 18 months down the line. This was drained, and I was given a short course of antibiotics. It came back, and was drained again. It never reappeared.
This is one of - many - things which puzzle me. If the infection was active, which is was certainly proved to be, why did this fluid never come back? Was it maybe some specific time in the lifecycle of the infection, which never occurred again? I dunno. You may have a giggle, however, when I tell you that I thought: "Oh great! An infection! They'll soon clear that up." (Bottom of the class again, Glynis.)
I have read through most of your thread, and it is encouraging that your medical professionals are obviously taking you seriously. You may well have some answers soon.
Incidentally, I asked my surgeon about taking antibiotics for dental work, and he said that in the view of his professional organisation it was not necessary. He said there is no evidence of a link to prosthesis problems, and he went on to say that the more antibiotics you take, the more you may be storing up trouble for yourself if you develop any kind of severe infection later in life, and have built up an immunity to them.
Well, this is becoming a bit of a rambling rose. I hope I will not get into trouble again for hijacking your thread.
You did ask!
Glynis