OK so had a Pre-op and Consent appointment re the 13 May right hip revision this morning, plus the 6 month review re my left hip revision. All fine regarding the left hip, and no further subsidence since the 3 month checkup, so that issue is now effectively closed. However, given all that, not sure what is the significance of the dark areas along the left hip stem, and if I should be concerned regarding this 6 months post op. The surgeon made no remark about it, but I am an expert worrier!
As to the right hip, it seems to be in a much less precarious condition than the left hip was pre-revision. If that is borne out intra-op, my Surgeon Mr Steele surmises that a shorter cemented stem could well suffice, partnered with a new cup. Due to the recent Stryker IT hack, he would use Smith and Nephew hardware instead. So if all goes to plan, I would have an uncemented long stem Stryker Restoration Trident in the left hip, and a shorter cemented Smith and Nephew in the right. That threw me a bit, as I expected the latter approach in both, but he is the expert.
As to long term plans and prognosis, his answers to both my questions were positive. Firstly, that it is a perfectly feasible proposition that these revisions could last me for the rest of my life. Secondly, I posited my hope of returning to road cycling, but mentioned if there were any concerns re the long stem in my left hip (long lever torsion fracture risk in case of an accident), and he simply said that he would get me back to that. He is a cautious guy, and a keen cyclist like me, and knows that a return to cycling would be more than just riding to the shops, so both his assent to that, and lack of concern gives me hope. But the right hip revision surgery 13 May first.
Finally, I tripped hiking Friday, and suffered a few abrasion on knees and hands. Mr Steele evinced zero concern regarding these, saying they should be well healed in plenty of time before 13 May, and the minimum required was for them to be dry and healing over – phew!