marmarmish
junior member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2023
- Messages
- 45
- Age
- 65
- Gender
- Female
- Country
United States
I am sooooooo conflicted!!! 
I had an app't this morning with the PA for my orthopedist. He was not happy with my ROM and I got the usual story that I have only 2 weeks left (to be within the 3 mos. window) for achieving my ROM and getting MUA. I told him what I've read about people often getting more ROM as the year progresses, and even getting MUA later too if needed. He refuted that and said you may get a little more ROM, but most of it will come within 3 mos. Further, their office doesn't do MUA after 3 mos. because of concern of breaking a bone or something. (Just as a note, this doctor has a stellar reputation in our area.)
When I got home I Googled, "can you get improved ROM after 3 months", and "can you get MUA after 3 months". Very little came back. Most everything said the same thing - that which we've all heard over and over.
I did however, find some articles on the National Library for Medicine website. (I'm not sure if I'm allowed to offer them here, but I have seen links for this website on other posts so I think they are okay, being it's a reputable site.) But these were the ONLY articles I found that supported long term improvement.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
"Most of the expected improvement in pain and function is achieved at 6 months postoperatively, but some further improvement can be expected up to 2 years postoperatively. ROM will also gradually improve up to 2 years after TKR, and reach the same level as before surgery."
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
"Early and late MUA resulted in statistically equivalent gains in ROM, regardless of timing after TKA. All groups showed an average improvement in ROM of ≥11°. MUA performed beyond 3 months, and even beyond 1 year, appears to be safe and may improve ROM ..."
This forum refutes the belief about "the 3 month window", and there have been many folks describing their personal stories of successfully achieving ROM much later. Indeed, I've even read stories from people saying their own doctors told them not to get hung up on this 3 mos. window business.
But is this occurring only for just a small percentage of people? If not, why don't we hear more about this? You'd think on this whole world wide web, there would be more acknowledgment of this alternative narrative and they'd be getting noticed by the industry, and doctors would start changing the way they look at all this! But they haven't.
I'm just so confused! Outcomes from MUA aren't always successful, and can even be detrimental.
But what if I don't do it and end up with a leg that I can't even ride a bike with, as the PA has warned!?
My gut is telling me to go with what I read so often on this forum and the NCBI articles above, and trust that my body will find it's way and give me my ROM. It's just soooooo scary to not do what the medical establishment is telling you to do!

I had an app't this morning with the PA for my orthopedist. He was not happy with my ROM and I got the usual story that I have only 2 weeks left (to be within the 3 mos. window) for achieving my ROM and getting MUA. I told him what I've read about people often getting more ROM as the year progresses, and even getting MUA later too if needed. He refuted that and said you may get a little more ROM, but most of it will come within 3 mos. Further, their office doesn't do MUA after 3 mos. because of concern of breaking a bone or something. (Just as a note, this doctor has a stellar reputation in our area.)
When I got home I Googled, "can you get improved ROM after 3 months", and "can you get MUA after 3 months". Very little came back. Most everything said the same thing - that which we've all heard over and over.
I did however, find some articles on the National Library for Medicine website. (I'm not sure if I'm allowed to offer them here, but I have seen links for this website on other posts so I think they are okay, being it's a reputable site.) But these were the ONLY articles I found that supported long term improvement.
Time-dependent improvement in functional outcome following LCS rotating platform knee replacement: A prospective longitudinal study in 50 patients
Long-term follow-up studies after total knee replacement (TKR) using an LCS rotating platform have shown survival rates of up to 97%. Few studies have evaluated short-term functional outcome and its improvement over time. We determined the time course ...
Efficacy of manipulation under anesthesia beyond three months following total knee arthroplasty
Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often treated with manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) to improve range of motion (ROM). However, many authors recommend against MUA beyond 3 months after TKA. This study investigates the timing of MUA ...
This forum refutes the belief about "the 3 month window", and there have been many folks describing their personal stories of successfully achieving ROM much later. Indeed, I've even read stories from people saying their own doctors told them not to get hung up on this 3 mos. window business.
But is this occurring only for just a small percentage of people? If not, why don't we hear more about this? You'd think on this whole world wide web, there would be more acknowledgment of this alternative narrative and they'd be getting noticed by the industry, and doctors would start changing the way they look at all this! But they haven't.
I'm just so confused! Outcomes from MUA aren't always successful, and can even be detrimental.
But what if I don't do it and end up with a leg that I can't even ride a bike with, as the PA has warned!?
My gut is telling me to go with what I read so often on this forum and the NCBI articles above, and trust that my body will find it's way and give me my ROM. It's just soooooo scary to not do what the medical establishment is telling you to do!
Last edited:

“
).
