I have not had the rolfing. Many, many massages and they always work..for a while. I do have some pelvic tilt/twist inlower back.
I got a second opinion from another OS that is highly recommended (Dr. Kelly who operates at Drke as well, but has a different clinic). I figured it would not hurt. He uses the anterior approach and has been doing it since 2005. His comments and bedside manner were great and I did listen to them. I wanted to get his take on the rt hip and then ask him about the anterior approach that he does for my left one down the road.
He siad that he did not follow much of the MOM issues with his cases because he never believed in using them. He did say the many of the Dr.s at Duke did and that they were one of the groups that had really speerheaded that in the US (explains why my replacement OS, Dr. Greenlaw, used them becasue he did his fellowship there). He said that my current OS (Dr. Attarian) would be a good authority on it because he had done many, many revisions of metal hips and was as up to date on the issue as anyone I could go to. As for his opinion, he agreed that with the metal ion levels being1.7 and 1.3 (and falling to those numbers) and with all the tests showing that the implant looks good, no real extra fluid collection, no other sign of anything wrong, he would stand pat. He did say that if I was in a great deal of pain that would make a difference but after watching me walk and putting me through some paces, he said that he would not recommend a revision but would watch the ion levels very closely.
Part of his reasoning was the fact that much of the pain that I have was there before the replacement (and it was). He looked at my original scope notes and asked me if I had read them. I said I had. In those notes, the arthroscopic Sergeon talks about how difficult that surgery was for him and how it took an extra hour and a half to complete it. Dr. Kelly just said that there was a very real possibility that something during that scoip could have damaged that tendon or cut someething, etc.. He said I may never know but that a revision was always a chance to go in both directions.
He did show me how the large cup could be an issue for that tendon and that is why he does not use them either (damn, wish I had gone to this guy huh). His partner at Chepel hill yesra ago wrote a paper on iliopsoad tendonitis in people with hip replacements (I have actually read that study). I asked him about scoping that tendon and releasing it and he gave me a "maybe..but" answer. He basically said that he would not rule it out and to ask the arthroscopic specialist I am going to see next week about it..but he cautioned that that was stillll another trauma to that area and that he had seen many scoped like that turn out to do more harm than good..but had seen it both ways. He just said that that decision would be mine to make and that I should consider the risk and make sure that I wanted to take the chance based on my pain level.
He also looked at my left hip and tole me that he would not let anyone touch it with any kind of arthroscopic procedure. He said that he did not think that the scope Doc would even recommend doing anything with it. My FAIS is just not scopable (wish the first scope hack would have admitted that). Hed told me to keep my conversation withthe scope specialist to my rt hip only (for possible tendon release).
Here is a little bit of info that some folks will want. He said that the new latest greatest scope techniques were more for young athletes. He really explaijned the difference in hip scopes and knee scopes and why the hip scopes weren't as successful. He also said that there were places in Tennessee, Colorado, and a few other places where the Dr.s were showing very low and aomost no fail rates. But he said that was not altogether true. He has treated 10 patients who have flown in to other places to have scopes done and then left and come to him later to have their hip replaced, or repaird in some way becuase the scope failed. He said that the Scope Doc does not list those patients on his fail list because they never go back. I found that interesting.
So, we'll see what happens with the tendon, but I do not see a revision coming with the numbers and replacement that I have. that can all change on any blood test I suppose...which is just the way life is for me). If the pain intensifies (it has been a bit better of late) and I can't live with it, I will go back and demand it...but to tell you the truth, with all the other stuff that has gone on lately...I am looking forward to the next appointment with the arthroscopic Dr. being the last one for a while. Even if we decide to release that tendon, I am not going to do it any time soon. My body needs time to regulate and quiet thie Hashimoto's storm down.
One last thing Dr. Kelley said to me. He said that many times, when people stopped going to appointments, and realized that they needed to live with what they had, they got better. He did not say that happened all the time, but he also recognized how many appointments I had been to and how that has probably affected me over the last year and a half. He said that there was a possibility that I would have to accept that even though I wanted a great result, I would have to live with an OK result.
As George Clooney said in "O Brother Where Art Though"...."We're in a tight spot".
I will report back after my visit with the Scope man next week.