A few weeks ago I mentioned I sort the opinion of another orthopaedic surgeon regarding my THR and he gave me a referral to yet another orthopaedic specialist to get his opinion.
I saw that doctor yesterday and he agreed that I do need revision surgery. The stem is too short, there has been subsidence even though the prosthesis is not loose and the acetabular cup although at a good angle is sitting too low. He could feel some sort of defect when he pressed on the trochanteric area and it also felt like the muscles had parted and he thought he could feel a hernia in the scar area. He could just replace the stem but ideally the acetabular cup should be higher up in the pelvis. So as far as I am concerned if he is going to fix the problem he may as well do it properly and replace the lot which is what he suggested. There is a 1.5 centimetre leg length discrepancy.
I asked whether my replacement hip would be ceramic on ceramic which I have now and he said it would most likely be polyethylene because there is a greater chance of dislocation after revision surgery. I did not ask why polyethylene would be better but I wished I had.
He cannot guarantee a complete recovery but maybe an eighty to ninety per cent recovery because of the previous muscle atrophy and fatty deposits. He thought it odd that the nerve conduction tests done in 2015 showed partial denervation in all the lower extremities but the tests to the gluteus muscles in 2016 showed nothing remarkable. He said because the muscles are working that is a good sign and yes there is hope of a reasonably good recovery but if I do nothing I will not get any better. So, even if I only have an eighty to ninety percent recovery I will still be better off than I am now. My limp is very bad. He also said that I am an "interesting case".
Another thing this doctor said was that he could not understand why the surgeon who did the initial surgery had not had an MRI done on my hip since the surgery. I have only a an MRI of my lower back since then because of my back problems and that only showed the top of the hip prosthesis.
This doctor was quite willing to do the surgery but since the referring specialist only asked for his opinion on the referral he was not sure whether the intention was for this doctor to do the surgery or just give his opinion. So he suggested I make an appointment to see the referring surgeon to discuss this matter and he would also write a letter to that doctor.
I am now seeing the referring surgeon on 7th March to discuss the conversation which followed between the two doctors. I was under the impression he wanted the doctor I saw yesterday to do the surgery but that surgeon did not want to operate without the approval of the first doctor. Ultimately of course the final decision on who does the surgery is up to me and looking at the two doctors' profiles the surgeon I saw yesterday does about 400 operative surgeries a year including 50 hip and knee revisions so he has plenty of experience.
@Josephine, When I eventually have the revision surgery do I have to start a new Bonesmart thread under revisions or do I just continue on with this thread? Also would you have any idea why a polyethylene replacement would be better than a ceramic one for a revision THR because I did not ask the doctor why he made that choice.