It is much too early in your recovery to worry about your range of motion. Your knee is still very swollen from the manhandling during surgery -- even if the external swelling is down, it is still inflamed inside -- and you cannot bend and straighten with swelling in the way.
You might want to re-read this article:
Swollen and stiff knee: what causes it?
Elevate and ice, ice and elevate as much as possible to help the swelling go down and you will see big changes to your ROM.
I have to say that despite I/E around the clock (exception is when up walking in house short distance for adl, fixing a snack, etc), I haven’t noticed any significant sustainable reduction in swelling in knee (only in the thigh). Last night I fell asleep with a gel ice pack on my knee and a couple hours later knee had puffed up more, and so then I put the cryocuff on. It verified I cannot stop the cryocuff at night. But that stupid noisy machine and constant squeezing of knee makes it hard to sleep anyplace other than my back. (Why I thought I’d try a gel ice pack last night to try to get some side sleeping in). So I’m also not getting anywhere close to the sleep I need.
I stretch gently several times per day but also whenever opportunity arises, eg bend knee while brushing teeth, etc. I wouldn’t say I make it painful; I stop at the point of discomfort. Then put ice on and foot up after.
I’m trying to activate quads but they are still so feeble and I feel like my leg will collapse if not careful. I can just barely lift leg off bed, but it causes pain around kneecap (tearing sensation above under incision).
I’m confused by the studies referenced in that link. The latest one referenced seems to contraindicate what Bonesmart says. Unless I’m reading it wrong, It seems to say evidence is showing that early manipulation before 12 weeks results in higher flexion gains. I know Bonesmart has years of anecdotal n = 1 case report stories that show ROM comes in time, and certainly would not meet criteria for even level C evidence standards. This only is capturing a certain subset of the population and there is inherent bias in these results. I am happy that the Bonesmart way has worked for some, but I’m afraid it’s not working for me so far.
Yes 3.5 weeks is still early…but acute injuries at this point are undergoing tissue remodeling and scar and adhesion can be forming now. The patients my colleagues see all do traditional PT and are advised to medicate and tolerate some pain during stretches…..and they on average have more range than me at this point. So I am of course very concerned that my knee has so little active movement. I am feeling my restriction in flexion at kneecap and just above, feels like a tearing sensation in muscles close to the quads tendon. And also generally tight all over.
ROM is critical to me for my quality of life. I’m active and need to be able to return to mountain biking, road cycling yoga, nordic skiing…and want to return to masters racing.
I have never been one to do well with not moving - I develop stiffness easily and the reason I had TKA in the first place was due to an irreversibly scarred/fibrotic tissue (plica) that wore the cartilage off my medial femoral condyle and impinged in the knee joint. OS said no scope, only TKA due to damage elsewhere. OS removed the plica and synovium.
Anyway, I know this is not the glowing report that people would like to see. Next week I start outpatient PT (I put it off a week thinking it might cause more harm than good and now I am questioning that decision, regretting not doing more earlier (I also had 2 home visits). And I am also returning to my chiropractor who did great work mobilizing my tissues pre-op.
Surely I can’t be alone in questioning who to trust and in wanting to go by the best available evidence from studies conducted with objective scientific rigour?