Well this professional can give professional advice backed up with literature and statistics which I will do my best to rediscover. There have been innumerable papers on this topic, some written by the pro camp and others by the anti camp. They all appear to come to the same conclusion.
For knee joint replacements the stats show that use of a CPM does not demonstrate any improved results over non-use of a CPM. This is a repeated conclusion. So why 'some' surgeons still insist on their use is a mystery! Obviously they don't read their own peer-reviewed publications! But the same can be said for use of anti-embolism stockings.
For those members who gleefully post that they 'love their CPM and use it all the time' and others who say 'I hated it', I would just say this:
a)the use or non-use of a protocol in one patient is not a viable statistic.
b) how would that individual know if use of the machine influenced their recovery? How would non-users know if NOT using it influenced their recovery? Truth is, they do not and they cannot.
My own (professional) opinion is that these are one-sided opinions with no empirical value whatsoever. Even the nurse who observed patients on her ward being stiff and concluded the non-use of the CPM to be responsible is just her
personal opinion.
So I typed "cpm in tkr" into Google and these were the
first five items that came up - interesting, no?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22959052
"No statistically significant differences were found in any of the outcome variables that were compared in this matched case design. No significant difference was found in all functional scores as measured by the Functional Independence Measure scale.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22708322
There were no statistical difference between the two groups for any outcome measures.
However, there was beneficial effect on subjective assessment of pain level, joint stiffness and functional ability.
https://www.wheelessonline.com/ortho/physical_therapy_after_tkr
- use of CPM may result in faster recovery of motion immediately after surgery, but appears not to ultimately increase ROM at one year post surgery;
https://physicaltherapy.about.com/od/orthopedicsandpt/a/Continuous-Passive-Motion.htm
Recently, the use of CPM during the post-operative period after TKR surgery has been called into question. Many well-designed studies that examined the effects of CPM after TKR have failed to show an added benefit from CPM when compared to active and passive physical therapy knee ROM exercises.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21752575
(Department of Orthopadic Surgery, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India.)
We concluded that CPM gives no benefit in immediate functional recovery post-TKA, and in fact, the postoperative knee swelling persisted longer. We have since then discontinued its use in our patients without any untoward effect.