Aggressive exercises do not prevent adhesions. If anything, aggressive exercises can contribute to getting adhesions. Here is an article from the Bonesmart library:Maybe most patients do fine either way, but they're just trying to prevent less common, but potentially serious issues like adhesions?
MUA (Manipulation under Anaesthetic) and adhesions
First let me first put your mind at rest - this is quite probably nothing to do with not having done enough PT or been 'good enough' in following orders. Here is my standard mini-lecture on the subject so read and absorb ... All the structures in the body, muscles, tendons, ligaments, even gut...
bonesmart.org
I, also, wonder why so many promote the more aggressive rehab, but I know it didn’t work for me, and I will never attempt it again. It caused me great pain, increased swelling, which literally took days to recover from. Even before I found Bonesmart I was telling my husband that it was counterproductive.
I no longer worry about that question, as in the 4 years that I have been a part of Bonesmart, I’ve seen many conflicting opinions about this recovery, and I’ve learned there is no one way to recover/rehab, as each of us is different. What works for one of us, may not work for someone else, and that’s ok. Our choice of rehab is indeed our choice. First of all we have to listen to our body, and how it responds to the rehab we choose. The key is, “Find what works for you.“ Your doctors, PTs and BoneSmart are here to help, but you are the final judge as to the recovery approach you choose.
I agree. Because my PTs and surgeons were fans of pushing my bend to a very painful level (before I’d had enough and refused to let them do it) the numbers they recorded look great on my record. But because I hadn’t healed enough to get that number on my own, I didn’t have the function that the number implied, so what good is that number on my record?I see a big downside to being told it is essential not to miss the window-of-opportunity to regain ROM -- recovery is stress enough without trying to second-guess the advice we're receiving from our medical team.
I also had 2 major setbacks, one at 4 months and one at 5 months, which resulted in a rather poor ROM. I don't know what the number was, as I wasn’t being measured at that time, but my function was very poor. As I gradually healed, I found that my ROM continued to increase not only in my second year, but also my third. It made me made angry to think of all the pressure early on to regain a certain ROM number and how worried my medical team made me. I won’t be making that mistake again, as I’ve gotten to the end and seen the proof of recovery, with a ROM thats fine.
United States