Not very good with computers & having trouble finding my way around. Managed (more by luck than judgement!) to post a question, Jamie replied asking for more info, which I supplied - now can't find where I posted it or how to access replies!
Anyway, I wonder whether anyone else has had a hip revision as opposed to a replacement? 13 years ago I had a replacement, which worked wonders, but it failed in January this year. End of April (yes, really!) they replaced the replacement. I believe there was quite a lot of reconstruction, bone grafting, a couple of screws, etc, so a biggish job.
Improvement was slow but sure for first couple of months or so, then stalled. Still have pain in and immediately under buttock, especially during/after sitting but also when trying to walk.
Frustratingly, I have recently had the odd couple of days when it seems much better, making me think it's finally on the mend. Then, without apparent reason, it goes back to square one, and am in despair again.
The surgeon (whom I've seen twice since), keeps fobbing me off, saying X-rays look 'fine'. Other medics (my gp, rheumatologist, registrar, orthopaedics nurse, etc etc) just keep telling me to ask the surgeon. Only he won't tell me anything!!! AAAARGH!
If anyone else has had this op, perhaps you could reassure me that nearly 6 months later it is normal to still be having pain? Any idea how long it will be before I can start sorting out my poor neglected garden? (I'm in the UK, by the way). Many thanks. Beesmum