Guest viewing is limited

Questions about which hip is best

Status
Not open for further replies.

artie1

new member
Joined
Sep 16, 2007
Messages
2
Location
United States
I am having a hip replacement in the very near future. I have been doing some reseach about the different materials/hips available and see that each has it's pros and cons. My OS first suggested the metal-on-metal since I am 55 and it lasts "forever". But I am also a cancer survivor (had my surgery and chemo almost two years ago) and I'm concerned about the ions from the metal-on-metal.
So my OS said he would do ceramic. That sounds just wonderful except for the problem with breakage. I have read that if the ceramic breaks it is "catastrophic" - like removing glass shards from a wound. Hmmm- that's scary.
But, then, the plastics have the problem with wear and particles causing problems like infection, etc. Help!
What is one to do ?
 
I've said this before and I'll say it again - I think expecting patients to research and choose their own prosthesis is very worrying! Where do you go to for this information? Mostly to the websites of the manufacturers! Answer me this - would you expect any manufacturer to be impartial about their own product? No!

Such detail of implants is a highly technical thing and akin (IMO) to asking someone to choose the most suitable antibiotic for an infection.

Also bear in mind that prostheses currently in use are all tried and tested and have a well proven track record. It is my belief that the only person properly equipped to make the choice is the OS himself as he actually understands all the nuances of which you speak.

Further, implants currently on sale are perfectly reliable. Failures such as you are describing are actually very rare. The most common failures have nothing to do with the prosthesis at all but are the result of poor operative technique. These would include 1. loosening, 2. pain and/or breakage resulting from incorrect positioning and 3. infection in that order.

All that having been said, somewhere along the line, someone in the US deemed it necessary for patients to be made to make this choice so you're stuck with it.

To get to basics - ceramic is a pretty durable material. Don't forget it was originally created for the tiles that cover the noses of the shuttles for re-entry into the earth's atmosphere. Plastic is pretty good too even though it does have a potential to wear. Must say though, in all my years I saw precious few patients come in to have a revision solely to replace a worn cup. Given that, the problem of debris from the wear seems somewhat academic. If you have, say, a 0.01% chance of wear then 0.01% of those will have a problem with infection from the debris. Hardly worth the effort of typing it out, is it.

At the end of the day, I can only tell you this. Everything has a potential for side-effects or problems. If you take an antihistamine, an antibiotic or any other med you could get side effects. If you have your bunion surgically corrected there's pretty much the same percentage of poor outcome, infection or failure as there is in a hip replacement.

My advice is to have your doctor choose you the best OS you can afford and/or get to and trust him because that's what I would do and have done. Your best investment is a man who knows what he's doing and has oodles of experience doing it. All the rest is just words on paper.
 
Thank you for your comment.
I thought I might find some sort of dialog pertaining to my dilema on this this site.
Instead, it seems, I have ruffled your feathers.
So I will continue to look for a supportive site.
 
Oh my goodness! If my feathers are ruffled, they are so in sympathy for you! I so feel for you guys across the pond that are put in this situation and I'm afraid I let it show. My bad!

I assure you my intention was to be supportive and I so apologise if it came across differently to that. Please, ask any questions you want. I will endeavour not to let my righteous indignation on your behalf get the better of me again.

However, I did seek to assure you that the complications you mentioned are pretty rare and that you could have more confidence in them than other competing manufacturers would have you believe. Believe me, after years of seeing reps who would come to my department claiming that their prosthesis was superior because another prosthesis had this or that potential, I learned to be sceptical about what they had to say.

My core advice is to rest on what your surgeon has to say about it. As for the ionising from metal on metal in your circumstances, I'm afraid that's out of my experience so I would not seek to offer advice there.

I hope this helps to counter my somewhat unfortunate outburst. I really do apologise for the way that came over.
 
Thank you for that reassurance, tallman. And Artie, if you're still viewing, please come back and talk. There are many other members here that would discuss with you.

What ever you decide, however, I wish you all the best and hope and pray you find a solution that is best for you. God bless.
 
I am a 61 year old male who had cancer 12 years ago and also underwent coronary bipass 10 years back.

I had my right hip resurfaced 5 months back. Investigate the recently FDA approved Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) system that results in a much more durable joint with minimal bone removal. I was up and walking on the new hip within hours after the surgery and was walking without a cane (and driving) at the end of 4 weeks.

Surgery took 90 minutes using a local (spinal block) and sedatives to control axiety. Recovery was so fast that people couldn't believe that I had my hip replaced. Didn't even need to go to rehab; just do some easy exercizes. Tell him there's nothing to fear and his quality of life will be greatly improved. The new system virtually eliminates the chance of dislocation!!

The joint is metal-on-metal, uses natural body fluids for lubrication, with an expected life of 40 years if I'm careful and don't abuse it, i.e., no jogging and sky-diving ;-)

check it out --->

https://www.activejoints.com/resurfacing.html
 
Mikey - have you seen my post about the lady who had her hip replaced in 1966? It's at the top of this forum. Amazing! Who would have thought it would last so long?
 
I have researched myself blind...

I know I should trust my OS, but there are so many unknowns. My first reputable OS, said he would have used metal. I feel very uncomfortable about the metal ions. I come from a family with lots of cancer, so reading that there are concerns even if not proven, that ions may affect tissue negatively really scares me. Osteolysis can happen with any type of replacement, it's just that studies show it happens more often with the poly's. I keep coming back to cross-linked poly, but I like the idea that metal on metal may last longer. I'll be 47 at the time of my replacement, that means based on life expectancy I will probley have one maybe two revisions....that's scary too. I know there are no guarantees in life, but having something put into my body makes me feel a bit crazy...
 
I feel for you friend. It's such a big decision. But think of it like this

Every week in the UK there are 2-3,000 hip replacements carried out. Only tiny proportion of these end up having problems. The rest get on with their lives and pretty much forget they've got anything extra inside their bodies! That's the trouble when we focus so much on the negative side of all this - as with any surgery. Bit like people getting overly concerned about plane crashes when they have to take a flight. It's easy to forget how many millions travel safely every day.

Which, of course, is not to say you shouldn't be aware, nor that you don't have special concerns. I know of several people who have past history of cancer that have had joint replacements but to my knowledge, there has never been a problem. And, of course, being UK residents, the type of prosthesis used was not an issue they knew anything about much less considered.

You have my sympathies in your dilemna - I just wish there was something more positive I could say to reassure you.

I see this has now flipped over to page 2 so in case you missed it, here's the article I think would be a good read for you.



https://bonesmart.org/forum/showpost.php?p=1554&postcount=1
 
After wrestling with the same decision for a few weeks I finally put my trust in my surgeon's skillful hands and am going to follow his recommendation: Ceramic. He too has ion concerns. Also I've had metal allergies previously. I verified with him he will be using the newer product (Trident) which I also researched via the internet, and agree he made the right decision. He asked me if I would be running or jumping, answer is no, so that is another contributing factor to his decision and mine. I'm scheduled for THR on December 10th.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom