Hi there, ross and welcome to the forum.
As an engineer would you agree that there is more wear in a hemispherical or universal joint than in a flatter one? For this is the case with joint replacements. In the 60 year history of hip replacements, wear was found to be a problem from the get go. In fact I might have been present the very first time it was identified!!
But though knees have a shorter history - around 40 years - the same has not been seen. From my experience and the papers I have read, wear is not as prevalent and problematic as it is in the hip. In other words, I have very rarely seen patients come in for knee revisions attributable to wear whilst it is somewhat more common in hips. So I really would not worry overmuch about that.
Secondly, I can understand your interest in the new Oxford knee but to be fair, the Radcliffe Hospital has probably more experience in designing knees than anywhere else and is certainly one of the most long serving and reliable knees going whatever its present incarnation! But the Stryker knee comes pretty close anyway. In fact, to be honest, they're all pretty much on a par as far as longevity and reliability are concerned.
So I would say go for the man with the experience and don't get too bogged down by the minuscule differences between this knee and that. I'd take the guy with the hands on skill any day what ever prosthesis he uses.
Let us know how you get on.