Dedicated_Dad
junior member
I never seem to be able to write a post that's not a book-full. I am sorry, but can't see how I can make it any shorter... Input appreciated...
I have been going to a different PT since my revision.
On my first visit, when we got to the point where he wanted to "stretch" my knee, in flexion -- I resisted. Going back to 2002, having the PT bend my knee until I scream has never worked for me. Lots of pain, no benefit at all - in fact I tended to actually LOSE range of motion, not to mention the fact that it would cause the knee to "flare" and thus reduce my activity even further.
In 2002 I was prescribed a broken link removed: https://www.jointactivesystems.com/downloads/JAS_knee_flex_english_instructions.pdfand painlessly restores range of motion in a few months. After my TKA in March I got it again, and made decent progress to 120 degrees in a few months.
The new PT got sort of poopy about it - "if you don't trust my judgement, then maybe I'm not the right person to..." I gave in and let him do his thing, but asked him to - once he saw it was not helping - let me do it "my way." When he saw my ROM was not increasing he upped my visits from 2 to 3x per week, which made my knee flare even worse and actually made my ROM go backwards.
A few weeks ago he offered to let me try it "my way" but if I was not making progress we'd go back to their yanking method.
It took 7-10 days for the knee to settle down so I could actually work the JAS. Over the next ~week or I gained about a degree per day WHEN MEASURED IN A SEATED POSITION.
He insists to measure the same way he always stretched it - with me on my stomach on the table, knee bent, pulling my foot up toward my head with a strap. In this position I see no improvement, though in seated position it steadily improving.
It finally clicked that the real difference is in "seated" position hips are bent, while on my stomach hips are straight. The JAS stretches the joint capsule, but does not stretch the long quad-muscle that runs from the pelvis down over the top of the knee.
They insist this "stomach" position is "the ONLY one that matters", that the only MEASUREMENT that matters is the one they take when I walk in the door - that "if I'm not carrying it over from visit to visit then it is irrelevant."
For clarity, now the only acceptable measure of progress is measured on arrival, in the aforementioned position. Nothing else matters.
On PT days, I get up, make and eat breakfast, take a shower and get dressed, then get in the car and drive for 30-40 minutes to get to the PT office. By the time I walk in the door I am all stiffened up - it's about the worst possible time to measure my ROM ability.
Today he really leaned on me - he wants to go back to him pulling on it. He agreed that it hadn't worked before, but claimed "what you're doing isn't working either." Actually it IS working, just not in their pet position...
I pointed out that it's not hard for THEM to jam it just a little more and get one more degree - they're not the ones who have to feel the pain, not just while it's happening but from a flared-up knee, but pain that lasts for days and ultimately never stops.
The reality is that their stretching - like I tried to tell him on day 1 - causes my knee to flare up and hurt all the time. As a result, I leave PT and go home to my bed/ice and usually spend the next day also in bed with the ice, eating pain pills, trying to get it to settle down. I struggle to make myself even go, especially on Monday when I've had the weekend to settle it down a bit...
Further, I honestly don't see the importance in this "supine" position. In real life we sit, we kneel, maybe we lean back on our haunches, or squat, but hips are always bent.
I don't need to be able to lay on my stomach and touch my heel to my rear-end. The only real-world position where this would matter is if I were on my knees and leaning backward to touch the back of my head to the floor.
What's the point - especially when it causes me so much pain? It seems to me that they're concerned with showing "progress" in their records. If I let them jam on it, of course they can squeeze out one more degree each visit - THEY aren't the ones who have to live with the pain!! I'd happily comply if I thought there was any benefit - but I just don't see it.
I also asked - IF I let them yank on it, are we going to measure my progress in the EXACT same way? "well, we may push on it a bit to see if we can get it to go just a little further..."
Then we're comparing apples and oranges.
If I am going to suffer all of this pain, then I need to know that there's really improvement. You've set the standard of success - as I described above - for JAS, why does it change if I let YOU stretch me?
Now he tells me I have the right to refuse, but if I am not willing to follow his instructions then he will have to note in my records that I am not compliant with their instructions. This feels like blackmail - he knows I am fighting with my disability insurance company, and they constantly review my records.
I spoke to another PT today - she always measures ROM in a seated position, she doesn't want to undercut someone else, but doesn't understand their insistence on this measurement since it is not in any way related to real-world functionality. She said if the patient is in pain the day after then she needs to back off.
I've about decided to switch to this other PT. I need some advice, here. I find it hard to accept something that hurts me so bad and has never - with 3 different PT's so far - done me any good. The previous PTs accepted the JAS and agreed that I made good progress with it.
Lastly, there's another point I think is important: They're telling me that my clunks because the muscles -- especially quads - are too weak, too loose. I have a significant "extension lag - my quads cannot contract short enough to keep knee locked straight while I do a straight-leg raise.
How does stretching my quad in this way benefit either of these? Seems to me it would be COUNTER to what I need to do...
The "flare" caused by their stretching makes my pain constant. With all my problems, I feel like I should work on strength and gait, and be able to exercise daily even if it meant ignoring ROM altogether for now.
If I can get the strength up, and the clunk stopped, then I'd have no pain and could then tolerate the ROM work! As it is, the flex-stretching keeps me flared and pain limits everything else.
Am I out of line? Is there any benefit to being able to touch my heel to the my rear while laying on my stomach? Is there any functional reason for this?
DD
I have been going to a different PT since my revision.
On my first visit, when we got to the point where he wanted to "stretch" my knee, in flexion -- I resisted. Going back to 2002, having the PT bend my knee until I scream has never worked for me. Lots of pain, no benefit at all - in fact I tended to actually LOSE range of motion, not to mention the fact that it would cause the knee to "flare" and thus reduce my activity even further.
In 2002 I was prescribed a broken link removed: https://www.jointactivesystems.com/downloads/JAS_knee_flex_english_instructions.pdfand painlessly restores range of motion in a few months. After my TKA in March I got it again, and made decent progress to 120 degrees in a few months.
The new PT got sort of poopy about it - "if you don't trust my judgement, then maybe I'm not the right person to..." I gave in and let him do his thing, but asked him to - once he saw it was not helping - let me do it "my way." When he saw my ROM was not increasing he upped my visits from 2 to 3x per week, which made my knee flare even worse and actually made my ROM go backwards.
A few weeks ago he offered to let me try it "my way" but if I was not making progress we'd go back to their yanking method.
It took 7-10 days for the knee to settle down so I could actually work the JAS. Over the next ~week or I gained about a degree per day WHEN MEASURED IN A SEATED POSITION.
He insists to measure the same way he always stretched it - with me on my stomach on the table, knee bent, pulling my foot up toward my head with a strap. In this position I see no improvement, though in seated position it steadily improving.
It finally clicked that the real difference is in "seated" position hips are bent, while on my stomach hips are straight. The JAS stretches the joint capsule, but does not stretch the long quad-muscle that runs from the pelvis down over the top of the knee.
They insist this "stomach" position is "the ONLY one that matters", that the only MEASUREMENT that matters is the one they take when I walk in the door - that "if I'm not carrying it over from visit to visit then it is irrelevant."
For clarity, now the only acceptable measure of progress is measured on arrival, in the aforementioned position. Nothing else matters.
On PT days, I get up, make and eat breakfast, take a shower and get dressed, then get in the car and drive for 30-40 minutes to get to the PT office. By the time I walk in the door I am all stiffened up - it's about the worst possible time to measure my ROM ability.
Today he really leaned on me - he wants to go back to him pulling on it. He agreed that it hadn't worked before, but claimed "what you're doing isn't working either." Actually it IS working, just not in their pet position...
I pointed out that it's not hard for THEM to jam it just a little more and get one more degree - they're not the ones who have to feel the pain, not just while it's happening but from a flared-up knee, but pain that lasts for days and ultimately never stops.
The reality is that their stretching - like I tried to tell him on day 1 - causes my knee to flare up and hurt all the time. As a result, I leave PT and go home to my bed/ice and usually spend the next day also in bed with the ice, eating pain pills, trying to get it to settle down. I struggle to make myself even go, especially on Monday when I've had the weekend to settle it down a bit...
Further, I honestly don't see the importance in this "supine" position. In real life we sit, we kneel, maybe we lean back on our haunches, or squat, but hips are always bent.
I don't need to be able to lay on my stomach and touch my heel to my rear-end. The only real-world position where this would matter is if I were on my knees and leaning backward to touch the back of my head to the floor.
What's the point - especially when it causes me so much pain? It seems to me that they're concerned with showing "progress" in their records. If I let them jam on it, of course they can squeeze out one more degree each visit - THEY aren't the ones who have to live with the pain!! I'd happily comply if I thought there was any benefit - but I just don't see it.
I also asked - IF I let them yank on it, are we going to measure my progress in the EXACT same way? "well, we may push on it a bit to see if we can get it to go just a little further..."
Then we're comparing apples and oranges.
If I am going to suffer all of this pain, then I need to know that there's really improvement. You've set the standard of success - as I described above - for JAS, why does it change if I let YOU stretch me?
Now he tells me I have the right to refuse, but if I am not willing to follow his instructions then he will have to note in my records that I am not compliant with their instructions. This feels like blackmail - he knows I am fighting with my disability insurance company, and they constantly review my records.
I spoke to another PT today - she always measures ROM in a seated position, she doesn't want to undercut someone else, but doesn't understand their insistence on this measurement since it is not in any way related to real-world functionality. She said if the patient is in pain the day after then she needs to back off.
I've about decided to switch to this other PT. I need some advice, here. I find it hard to accept something that hurts me so bad and has never - with 3 different PT's so far - done me any good. The previous PTs accepted the JAS and agreed that I made good progress with it.
Lastly, there's another point I think is important: They're telling me that my clunks because the muscles -- especially quads - are too weak, too loose. I have a significant "extension lag - my quads cannot contract short enough to keep knee locked straight while I do a straight-leg raise.
How does stretching my quad in this way benefit either of these? Seems to me it would be COUNTER to what I need to do...
The "flare" caused by their stretching makes my pain constant. With all my problems, I feel like I should work on strength and gait, and be able to exercise daily even if it meant ignoring ROM altogether for now.
If I can get the strength up, and the clunk stopped, then I'd have no pain and could then tolerate the ROM work! As it is, the flex-stretching keeps me flared and pain limits everything else.
Am I out of line? Is there any benefit to being able to touch my heel to the my rear while laying on my stomach? Is there any functional reason for this?
DD