1958slewis
new member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2019
- Messages
- 14
- Age
- 65
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
Hi to all from the UK
Thought I would post an update, nearly a year since my TKR. I continued with all my exercises, including daily walks. I still have a clonking sound from my knee and it feels lax or loose at times. I have slight pain on the outside of the knee and referred pain, still, in my right buttock and hip, due, I think, to the valgus alignment. The knee feels fairly stable and has not given way.
I have seen my original consultant and we have reviewed the long leg X rays. He was apologetic about the 'valgus deformity', as he put it, and has said that it is due to the tibial component positioning. We were in agreement that my knee is certainly performing better than before the operation.
I asked to be referred to a revision expert to discuss options. I saw him recently and had a frank conversation about the way forward. He agreed that the knee is aligned significantly valgus, at about 13 degrees. There is no middle ground and to correct it would need a revision by replacing both components. He offered to put me on his list straight away but we agreed that, at this time, as I am not in constant pain and have mobility, that a revision was not justified at this time. He did state that the implants would undoubtedly wear more quickly due to the deformity and slight instability. He will review me again in 6 months.
I will see how the knee progresses over the next 6 months and monitor if I think there is some deterioration or worsening of symptoms. I am very fortunate to be able to walk, cycle and play golf occasionally and the knee has not given way. It swells up when I overdo it truly is a lot better than pre TKR.
I think I have a tough decision to make. As you all know, the operation is traumatic, and do I opt for another one, with all the risks that entail, when, at the moment it is functioning fairly well. I am nearly 62 and could probably cope with a revision and the PT afterward but may not be able to 5 years down the line. But there are no guarantees with these types of operations, as a quick read of the Forum here confirms. Also, I have to bear in mind that I may be incurring damage to my hip or ankle, for instance, due to the misaligned components.
Sorry to have rambled on a bit. Any thoughts would be welcome. x
Thought I would post an update, nearly a year since my TKR. I continued with all my exercises, including daily walks. I still have a clonking sound from my knee and it feels lax or loose at times. I have slight pain on the outside of the knee and referred pain, still, in my right buttock and hip, due, I think, to the valgus alignment. The knee feels fairly stable and has not given way.
I have seen my original consultant and we have reviewed the long leg X rays. He was apologetic about the 'valgus deformity', as he put it, and has said that it is due to the tibial component positioning. We were in agreement that my knee is certainly performing better than before the operation.
I asked to be referred to a revision expert to discuss options. I saw him recently and had a frank conversation about the way forward. He agreed that the knee is aligned significantly valgus, at about 13 degrees. There is no middle ground and to correct it would need a revision by replacing both components. He offered to put me on his list straight away but we agreed that, at this time, as I am not in constant pain and have mobility, that a revision was not justified at this time. He did state that the implants would undoubtedly wear more quickly due to the deformity and slight instability. He will review me again in 6 months.
I will see how the knee progresses over the next 6 months and monitor if I think there is some deterioration or worsening of symptoms. I am very fortunate to be able to walk, cycle and play golf occasionally and the knee has not given way. It swells up when I overdo it truly is a lot better than pre TKR.
I think I have a tough decision to make. As you all know, the operation is traumatic, and do I opt for another one, with all the risks that entail, when, at the moment it is functioning fairly well. I am nearly 62 and could probably cope with a revision and the PT afterward but may not be able to 5 years down the line. But there are no guarantees with these types of operations, as a quick read of the Forum here confirms. Also, I have to bear in mind that I may be incurring damage to my hip or ankle, for instance, due to the misaligned components.
Sorry to have rambled on a bit. Any thoughts would be welcome. x