sfbaylover
junior member
Hello,
Long-time member here who is planning on having right hip replacement surgery performed this year. I have two bad hips (as a result of having SCFE as a teenager), but my right hip is the worst, so I'm going to tackle that one first.
One question I have is the following:
How important a factor is a surgeon's age when selecting a potential hip surgeon? It's something that I have never considered previously but have only recently begun to ponder. Would you feel more comfortable with an older, more experienced surgeon (possibly one who is 65-75) or a younger, less experienced surgeon (40-50), assuming both surgeons were actual hip specialists who, despite their differences in age and experience, were both still highly qualified and capable surgeons?
In my case, my chosen surgeon is 74 years old and is slowly winding down his practice, to the point where he is performing hip replacement surgeries one day a week (on Wednesdays only), so I'm assuming that he is nearing retirement. He does, however, have a boatload of surgical experience, and is the current Surgeon-in-Chief Emeritus at one of the highest-rated orthopedic hospitals in the U.S (He was the actual Surgeon-in-Chief at this very same facility for over a decade -- until 2014). He also has a full surgical calendar (surgeries booked several months in advance) and travels extensively for orthopedic seminars and lectures, so he's still very much engaged in and involved with his profession.
And as I mentioned previously here, I never before much considered the age of a surgeon to be a potential factor in choosing a particular surgeon (except for extremely young surgeons: I never fancied being operated on by a just-starting-out surgeon or by a surgeon with only a few years' experience; rather, I always felt it "safer" to go to an older, more seasoned surgeon).
Any thoughts about anything that I have mentioned here? Is there a demarcation to where you would say a surgeon is either too young or too old, at least generally speaking?
Thanks,
Jason
Long-time member here who is planning on having right hip replacement surgery performed this year. I have two bad hips (as a result of having SCFE as a teenager), but my right hip is the worst, so I'm going to tackle that one first.
One question I have is the following:
How important a factor is a surgeon's age when selecting a potential hip surgeon? It's something that I have never considered previously but have only recently begun to ponder. Would you feel more comfortable with an older, more experienced surgeon (possibly one who is 65-75) or a younger, less experienced surgeon (40-50), assuming both surgeons were actual hip specialists who, despite their differences in age and experience, were both still highly qualified and capable surgeons?
In my case, my chosen surgeon is 74 years old and is slowly winding down his practice, to the point where he is performing hip replacement surgeries one day a week (on Wednesdays only), so I'm assuming that he is nearing retirement. He does, however, have a boatload of surgical experience, and is the current Surgeon-in-Chief Emeritus at one of the highest-rated orthopedic hospitals in the U.S (He was the actual Surgeon-in-Chief at this very same facility for over a decade -- until 2014). He also has a full surgical calendar (surgeries booked several months in advance) and travels extensively for orthopedic seminars and lectures, so he's still very much engaged in and involved with his profession.
And as I mentioned previously here, I never before much considered the age of a surgeon to be a potential factor in choosing a particular surgeon (except for extremely young surgeons: I never fancied being operated on by a just-starting-out surgeon or by a surgeon with only a few years' experience; rather, I always felt it "safer" to go to an older, more seasoned surgeon).
Any thoughts about anything that I have mentioned here? Is there a demarcation to where you would say a surgeon is either too young or too old, at least generally speaking?
Thanks,
Jason