Guest viewing is limited

DVT/PE and Thromboprophylaxis

Status
Not open for further replies.

nickji

member
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
163
Age
80
Location
Travelling for 39 years
Gender
Male
Country
United Kingdom United Kingdom
Hi Everyone,

This subject has been discussed in a previous recent thread, but mixed up with questions about Ted's and alcohol. The literature is so enormous and so contradictory, and the subject so important, that I feel it deserves a new thread. If not, I'm sure the mods will move this post appropriately.

On the site: https://www.totaljoints.info/previous_news.htm
scrolling down to the section headed:POTENT DRUGS AGAINST DVT ASSOCIATED WITH HIGHER RISK OF DEATH AFTER TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT
and dated 10/4/08, I went to a PubMed link in the citations and came across this study, which seems worth quoting:

Sharrock NE, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Go G, Lyman S, Salvati EA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA. [email protected]
Anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis after THA and TKA has not been confirmed to diminish all-cause mortality. We determined whether the incidence of all-cause mortality and pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty differs with currently used thromboprophylaxis protocols. We reviewed articles published from 1998 to 2007 that included 6-week or 3-month incidence of all-cause mortality and symptomatic, nonfatal pulmonary embolism. Twenty studies included reported 15,839 patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin, ximelagatran, fondaparinux, or rivaroxaban (Group A); 7193 receiving regional anesthesia, pneumatic compression, and aspirin (Group B); and 5006 receiving warfarin (Group C). All-cause mortality was higher in Group A than in Group B (0.41% versus 0.19%) and the incidence of clinical nonfatal pulmonary embolus was higher in Group A than in Group B (0.60% versus 0.35%). The incidences of all-cause mortality and nonfatal pulmonary embolism in Group C were similar to those in Group A (0.4 and 0.52, respectively). Clinical pulmonary embolus occurs despite the use of anticoagulants. Group A anticoagulants were associated with the highest all-cause mortality of the three modalities studied.


The original site goes further and says that the quoted study also states:

“We believe that ACCP should reconsider their guidelines to reflect the fact that PE occurs despite the use of potent anticoagulants and may, in fact, expose patients to increased mortality after surgery." (ACCP = American College of Chest Physicians).

It would be very interesting to hear if you have come across other expert opinion, or know of actual cases, that either do or do not support this study and others cited in the original site I mentioned, all of which seem to be in favour of aspirin and against the modern high potency drugs.

I'm off to find a Willow tree....

All the best

Nick
 
Nick, that is a SUPERB site! And compiled by an orthopaedic surgeon, no less! I recommend ALL members to read it but it is a phenomenal resource, so don't expect to skim through it in a few minutes. I've been over an hour reading it and have only touched on a few topics.

Please, everyone, read it and read it thoroughly!

And that bit about DVT/PE - very interesting. I don't claim to be even moderately knowledgeable about this treatment; my skills are elsewhere. But this subject is grabbing my attention, thanks to you!

I was also interested to read the article about prophylactic antibiotics and dental treatment. Must say my thoughts ran along the same lines but with not nearly so well studied support!

Thanks again, Nick.
 
Since I had a major DVT 3 months prior to my Simultaneous Bi-lat surgery believe me this was something I researched.
I have attached a few more articles for any one that is interested.

Bottom line an experienced, up to date surgeon has got your back on this but doing your home work can make you feel a lot better about your choice.

Donna
 

Attachments

"has got your back on this"??

Don't understand this, Mom.
 
I am sorry Jo,
Maybe it is an American expression - it means they have the experience and knowledge to make the best decision for you. :) (got your back = I will protect you so nothing sneaks up behind you);)

Donna
 
Ah - that makes sense! Not heard it before.
 
Wow! Agree with Jo. Awesome site. Worth the time.

BTW - Nick, excellent willow bark reference!

An editorial (from me? imagine that.)
I couldn't place the guy's accent (can you have an accent with typed words?) but then saw he was from the Czech Republic and further trained and worked in Sweden. Not to make too many sweeping generalizations, but this is reassuring to me. Pick up a Volvo ad sometime and you'll see the phrase "almost perfect". You see, there are laws in Sweden that dictate truth in advertising and since perfection is an ideal, not a reality, the car company cannot claim there car is perfect as no car is truthfully perfect for everyone. This may seem like a minor point, but really reflects their society's values and certainly makes me feel better about an objective viewpoint from this author.
 
I agree--great references. Did I mention that I love this forum.
This site in general seems to confirm for me that the statistical risk of complications for THR is not 1-2%, as I have been assuming, but more like 5+% and maybe slightly higher for resurfacing. That is more in line with what my gut has been telling me. It's not changing my mind. After all, my choices are somewhat limited and those risks are still low. To the contrary, it reinforces my belief that research and hard work in educating oneself and in particular, choosing a surgeon, will bring one's risk down substantially.
Well, you know what they say about assuming
 
Oh yes! I meant to comment on the willow! Neat!

I also noticed an article about using gentamycin in bone cement and he mentioned Professor Bucholtz (sp?). This man almost came to us (in Essex) for a hip revision which had already been done twice and totally botched and now infected (tragically ironic since he was a premier hip surgeon himself!). There was quite a to-do about it because he was such a VIP and they were jumping all over the place about it. The surgeon concerned, John Read, was one of the first revision specialists in the UK and a former registrar of Charnley's. However, in the end they decided to take John over there to do it.
 
Nick, GREAT thread and you were so right to make it one all its own. Thanks!!
 
Agree--great site. Found it about 3 months ago--lots of really good info. Think I may have posted something here (remember saying something about needing to get past the occasional bit of "Swedish English"). Even though he's retired, he apparently keeps up with latest news. Below is my absolute favorite quote of his:

The most nonsense answer to a patient complaining of pain in the operated total hip / knee is: “Your x-ray pictures are normal”. If only Internet information could eradicate this nonsense answer much will be done.

If we all had a nickel for every time we've heard that . . . :-)
 
Same kind of nonsense plagues people with back pain!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Back
Top Bottom