Traceyleth
junior member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Messages
- 68
- Age
- 52
- Gender
- Female
- Country
United Kingdom
I am 35 years old and was diagnosed with OA about 5 years ago after suffering pelvis problems during and after my three pregnancies. About three years ago my doctor did some research and referred me to a very good OS who suggested that in time i would need joint replacement and because of my age resurfacing would be the best option. I have been monitored regularly but past six months life has been very hard and yesterday i went back to see surgeon who agreed time was right for surgery. Initially we were talking resurfacing but my husband mentioned as we were leaving that i have skin allergies to nickel and suddenly the surgeon said not to risk resurfacing as there maybe a 20-30% chance of allergic reaction, i would therefore need THR and the new ceramic on ceramic prosthesis would be used. I am just a bit thrown as i have spent 5 years gathering info on resurfacing and listening to how much better it is for younger patients, thinking how lucky i will be not to have a THR at this age and now im booked in for a THR. My surgeon is highly regarded by everyone i have spoken to so i trust the decision i just need to get my head round the change. I would love to hear from anyone who has any info on the new creamic on ceramic THR or anyone who has had similar experience. Also i have booked the surgery for end of July as its easier for me to get help with kids and cope without driving during the 6 week summer holidays, hopefully i will be fine by the time kids go back in september. Any advice on recovery would also be appreciated.