Article from "O" Magazine-about replacement surgery

Status
Not open for further replies.

kiddthekatt

new member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Messages
15
Age
69
Location
United States
Hi;
I copied this from another site forum after reading it. I bought the May issue of "O" magazine and read it for myself. Surprsingly enough, I didn't find not 1 of the 3 OSs I used on any of the websites.

Something of interest to us all:
"A government investigation turns up payola between joint makers and orthopedic surgeons."

You can find the complete article on page 194 of the May 2008 issue of O Magazine. It details how doctors have been given "consulting fees" by the makers of the implants they use to replace our knees with...even if it may not have been the best choice for the patient! The U.S. Department of Justice investigation implicated the TOP 5 medical device makers, which accounts for nearly 95% of the knee and hip replacements on the market.

This is something we all need to be aware of, you can check for yourself to see if your doctor or medical center was involved. I did. You will be surprised at how much these doctors were paid, and for what, travel expense, food, even gifts! The article goes on to tell you that you can check yourself to see if your doctor was involved:

"So how do you check up on your surgeon? As part of the agreement, the five companies-Zimmer, DePuy Orthopaedics, Smith & Nephew, Biomet Orthopedics, and Stryker Orthopaedics-must post consultants' names and how much they've been paid on their Web sites through 2009. You can put your mind at ease by first looking for your orthopedic surgeon's name on the Web site of the implant he recommends, says Kassirer (click on Company Consultants-Identification and Payments). And get a second opinion regarding which hip or knee implant is the best fit."
 
DW6928 Made mention of this the other day to Patti about the smith & nephews ( I have them also). The web site did list my Dr. Honestly. I'm OK with it. Maybe because if I read it right they only covered my OS' tarvel expeneses vs. big $ fee. My surgery is done, so obviously I'm not going to change out my devices. But also in many conversations we have had on this forum regarding which one is best for different reasons, Josephine has made the point that for the most part, they all are very similar and do a good job at their intended purpose. (See Jo, we do listen!) All this does explain though why each surgeon chooses one over another. For me, bottom line, trust the surgeons skills. Look at thier experience and success rate with which ever device they have "been exposed to". But it is good to know the process they use to pick & choose. Kinda like when the drug reps show up at the DR office with pizzas for lunch.
 
Hi Folks

I did the search and here are the sites. If you have trouble with the length just type in everything up to .com and you will see the link

Simon

Zimmer
https://www.zimmer.com/web/enUS/pdf/Company_Consultants5.pdf

DePuyOrthopedics
https://www.depuyorthopaedics.com/c...orthopaedics.com/pdf/consultantdisclosure.pdf

Smith & Nephew
https://www.smithnephewdpacompliance.com/

There are 2 sections to this list so go to the end

Biomet
https://www.biomet.com/ci/consultant_disclosure.cfm

Another 2 part list

Stryker

broken link removed: https://www.stryker.com/meetourconsultants/consultants/consultants_location.php
 
Simon, thanks for doing all the gurnt work to locate each site. It was interesting to check. Fortunately or unfortunately it doesn't appear that anyone from my doctor's staff has been a paid consultant for any of the companies.
 
Interesting info there, people. Happily in the UK we are protected from those kinds of practices.
 
NHS is in charge of purchasing and though surgeons might accept 'bunce' in the form of travel to conferences (in ski resorts
[Bonesmart.org] Article from "O" Magazine-about replacement surgery
) it's not considered good form to accept outright cash payments and the GMC (General Medical Council) wouldn't look kindly upon any medical practitioner caught doing so. There have been cases of impropriety brought by the GMC.


 
Josephine, that's one place where you guys are definitely ahead of us in the USA. The practice of "favors" is very common in all businesses here. I used to work for the Federal Government and we were NOT allowed to take anything from any vendors. It certainly didn't mean they didn't try, but you just learn to say no. I'm glad my doctors and hospital were not on those lists either.
 
Simon, Thank You For Posting The Websites. I Don't Know That I Would Have Cared If My Doctor Had Been On The List But Since He Wasn't It Is Nice To Know. For The Most Part It Seemed Like The Payment Made To Most Of The Doctors Was Pretty Small, Hardly What You Would Call Payola, But Then For A Few It Was Substantial And That Makes It Wrong I Suppose Whether It Was A Large Payment Or A Small One Where The Law Was Concerned. I Don't Know Much About Things Like This And Won't Pretend I Do. Still It Was Nice To See My Os's Name Missing From The List. Thanks Again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom