BoneSmart® Hip / Knee Replacement Forum
Joint Replacement Patient Advocacy
and Online Community
Dismiss Notice

Shopping on Amazon Prime Day July 15-16?

Make purchases through and Amazon will donate a portion of your purchase amount to BoneSmart!

Sign up at and indicate our parent organization, The Foundation for the Advancement in Research in Medicine, Inc. All of the donation funds received from Amazon purchases are transferred to BoneSmart to help keep us up and running.

Metal on Metal A Study of Taper Corrosion in 111 Current Generation Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Components

Discussion in 'Allergies and MoM articles' started by Josephine, May 4, 2016.

  1. Josephine

    Josephine FORUM ADMIN, NURSE DIRECTOR Administrator
    Thread Starter

    Member Since:
    Jun 8, 2007
    The North
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    A Study of Taper Corrosion in 111 Current Generation Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Components PAPER NO. 357
    Alister Hart, FRCS, London, United Kingdom
    Adam Hexter, London, United Kingdom
    John Skinner, FRCS, London, United Kingdom
    Johann Henckel, BM, London, United Kingdom
    Gordon W. Blunn, MD, Middlesex, United Kingdom
    Ferdinand Lali, PhD
    Ashley Matthies, BSc, London, United Kingdom

    INTRODUCTION: In 2009 it was reported that 35% of all hips in the United States were large diameter head metal-on-metal total hip replacements (LHMoM THR). However, there are several recent reports of unacceptably high rates of failure of this type of hip: up to 49% at five years that have been attributed to corroded taper junctions. There are no studies that have quantified the corrosion of the tapers from current generation MoM hips. We aimed to characterize taper corrosion of the three most commonly used LHMoM THRs and investigate the influence of design and femoral diameter.

    METHODS: Corrosion was qualitatively assessed for 111 components of three different designs; the ASR XL (DePuy), the BHR (Smith and Nephew) and Durom (Zimmer) devices. A peer-reviewed qualitative grading system was used. An unanticipated finding was a ridged appearance on most female taper surfaces, which corresponded with the ridges of the trunnion surface. A subjective grading system was devised to quantify this imprinting phenomenon.

    RESULTS: We found that 92% of components were corroded to some extent with at least moderate corrosion observed in 61%. There was no significant difference in corrosion between the different manufacturers both in terms of the head components (p=0.52) and trunnions (p=0.20). Increasing head size showed a weak but significant positive correlation with corrosion (r=0.241, p=0.02). The imprinting scores and corrosion scores showed a strong and significant positive correlation (r=0.776, p=0.01).

    DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Corrosion was not manufacturer dependent, with no difference observed between the ASR XL device and other hip types. An unexpected finding was that the corrosion was strongly associated with the presence of ridges on the female taper surface. We believe the rough surface of the trunnion is causing considerable mechanical wear at the female taper surface and creating an aggressive corrosive environment. Larger head diameters experienced greater corrosion, which is of clinical significance given the evolution towards larger femoral head sizes. We recommend review of the use of ridged trunnions in combination with cobalt-chrome head components and believe large head diameters should be used with caution until greater understanding of the mechanical forces on the head-trunnion junction is achieved.



Share This Page