I am due to have a ceramic on poly hip replacement in December of this year. I, too agonized over which material and prosthesis is best. The consensus seems to be that they are all pretty much the same, with no one specific type of implant or material being any better than another. Prior to my consultation with my hip surgeon in March of this year, I was expecting to receive a large-ball ceramic on ceramic hip prosthesis, but I was shocked when my surgeon recommended a ceramic on poly hip (36mm head). The research I did prior to my consultation seemed to indicate that for young, active patients (I'm 43), a ceramic ball mated to a ceramic bearing would offer the greatest wear resistance. And in actual trials, that seems to be the case (at least in the numerous studies and publications I have read measuring the wear rates in clinical studies). However, the newer poly bearings used nowadays show almost as good a wear resistance as the ceramic and are supposed to be more forgiving in terms of how they are positioned (alignment issues) and also may offer greater durability against (cracking/shattering).
But you will hear differences of opinion depending on whom you ask. Some surgeons prefer to use the tried-and-true prosthetic materials; others believe in experimenting and using different materials for different situations. The best thing is to select a highly competent and experienced hip surgeon and then trust his/her judgement as to which type of prosthesis and approach he/she wishes to use.
I'm having my hip replaced by Thomas Sculco at HSS in New York City. He is the surgeon-in-chief-emeritus and has been doing hip replacements since the late 1960s, so he is one of the most experienced surgeons at that hospital. So, I trust his judgement and know that I will be in good hands.